I said that if someone was to be fined/charged with blasphemy in court, wouldn’t the court have to then prove –first– that god exists?
I mean, “ya know” (hehe), wouldn’t you have to put god on trial in order to prove that said protagonist was infringing on something that in-fact exists. I know that the belief “inside” some people does in-fact exist, but when it comes to fines, jail-time or criminal records i believe the time for being considerate towards other peoples beliefs, stops.

But the barber made a very good point; “don’t you have to put your hand on the bible and swear to god at the beginning of a trial?”.

“YOU SLY BASTARDS!” i thought. For this reason alone, could “putting god on trial” so to speak, become negated because you yourself swore on the bible?

[BTW, keep it up! I heard you on the radio and i have to say, all this is AN ABSOLUTE JOKE!]

Gods can really suck sometime, isn’t it?

How long will taxpayers have to go on subsidising the stairway to heaven for weak minded politicians.

“It arbitrarily excludes what it describes as “cults” whose primary aim is to make profit or who employ oppressive psychological techniques.”
where is the diffrence to any religion?
it´s all about the money and power over people.
in fact,”psychological techniques” are a core part of any religion.
this law is just one thing,plain bullshit.